This is an archived copy of the KMS website from April 2021. To view the current website, click here.



27 September

27 September 1920

Your Link

Travelling to Menton, France

To business.
Your Wilde, Bogey, was extremely good. You put him in his place without for a moment pronouncing a judgment which was not strictly critical. What I mean is its so very difficult with a man like Wilde to get him & keep him inside that strange sort of ring through which one gazes at ones ‘specimens' at the moment of writing. Know what I mean? Its a kind of expanding & contracting ring - you can pull your specimen up very near, so near that you can count the hairs of his spiritual eyebrows - or you can send him far far - a speck on the horizon. Wilde - the immense temptation is to take your eye away and see him there without its aid. You haven't. I note, tho', darling, the last sentence and it makes me smile a little . . . Instead of ‘a great biography' you can't resist poor old Frankie's dreadfully battered hat & his: ‘I knew you as a boy, Sir.' I understand .. . [. . .]
410-411 look very dull, don't they But it can't be helped, I realise. I think our Library Table is - no, its not dull. At the same time its not interesting - is it? I feel the paper lacks something, lacks a column - on the lines we suggested for Delamare. Do you feel it a bit scrappy? I don't bite in to it.
About the leaders - there again I think they ought to be more pro¬nouncedly the work of one hand. They ought to be just a touch caustic or (appalling word) bright. They can't compel in such a little space they ought to attract. If that can't be done I think real good pars. would be better. Talk it over with me - will you? [Letter to J. M. Murry in Collected Letters 1920]